Previous CloneSet | Next CloneSet | Back to Main Report |
Clone Mass | Clones in CloneSet | Parameter Count | Clone Similarity | Syntax Category [Sequence Length] |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 2 | 2 | 0.960 | executable_statement |
Clone Abstraction | Parameter Bindings |
Clone Instance (Click to see clone) | Line Count | Source Line | Source File |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 9 | 2339 | plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core/compiler/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/parser/Parser.java |
2 | 8 | 8944 | plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core/compiler/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/parser/Parser.java |
| ||||
{ //avoid a isSomeThing that would only be used here BUT what is faster between two alternatives ? System.arraycopy( this.astStack, this.astPtr + 2, statements = new Statement[length - 1], 0, length - 1); constructorCall = (ExplicitConstructorCall) this.astStack[this.astPtr + 1]; } |
| ||||
//avoid a isSomeThing that would only be used here BUT what is faster between two alternatives ? { System.arraycopy( this.astStack, this.astPtr + 2, cd.statements = new Statement[length - 1], 0, length - 1); cd.constructorCall = (ExplicitConstructorCall) this.astStack[this.astPtr + 1]; } |
| |||
//avoid a isSomeThing that would only be used here BUT what is faster between two alternatives ? { //avoid a isSomeThing that would only be used here BUT what is faster between two alternatives ? System.arraycopy(this.astStack, this.astPtr + 2, [[#variable8f12dc40]]= new Statement[length - 1], 0, length - 1); [[#variable8f12dbe0]]= (ExplicitConstructorCall) this.astStack[this.astPtr + 1]; } |
CloneAbstraction |
Parameter Index | Clone Instance | Parameter Name | Value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | [[#8f12dc40]] | cd.statements |
1 | 2 | [[#8f12dc40]] | statements |
2 | 1 | [[#8f12dbe0]] | cd.constructorCall |
2 | 2 | [[#8f12dbe0]] | constructorCall |